User talk:Eclectics: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1:
==Begin Wiki Responses by Kataclysm==
*<font color=gray> can we add games we find online? ie SLICK, old lists, users external pages?</font color> <font color=purple>YES, let's gather all the pyramid games we can find, from all the old sites.</font color>
#<font color=gray> should we just be referencing the external page? </font color><font color=purple> We can reference it, but it's not ideal to have only a reference to their page, because so often people's sites get taken down. So we should also do our own rendition of the rules on a page we create for that game. </font color>
Line 12 ⟶ 13:
*<font color=gray> when parts of talk pages are clearly out of date, should we clean them up? strikeout to indicate things done, or delete sections?</font color><font color=purple>How much do you know about Talk pages? Because I don't know anything about them. It feels like if we delete stuff, we'll be deleting history that might be important, but honestly other than quoting that person's paragraph from 10 years ago and saying "Done!" I don't know how to do this in an organized way.
*<font color=gray> subpages vs namespaces? is this : vs / ? ie Browse Games has / -- what does this do?</font color><font color=purple>So subpages are what I've been using lately in trying to make a separation between product pages and game pages. I'm doing that because it makes sense to my brain, and because the slashes have allowed Dazeysan to programmatically create links to certain things in the infobox. Doing it this way (subpages) is not necessarily The Way It Will Always Be. It's just what's working right now. I'm definitely open to new information.
*<font color=gray> Are we using Project, Project Talk, </font color><font color=purple>Well, ''I'm'' not, because I don't know what those are. I do feel there must be a better way to discuss what should happen with this Wiki other than people's Talk pages. There needs to be a forum structure so people can have their say, upvote/downvote things, and find what others have said in an easy-to-use way. Do you know of such a thing, but built into the Wiki?</font color></font color>
-Kataclysm 2:42 PM EST 2024.04.28