Talk:Homejinks: Difference between revisions

Line 40:

| I || R/Y || G/B || At first it seemed a good idea to have G/B together, but it didn't work that well.

|-

| II || R/G || Y/B || This game works better, but the R/G combo is frustrating: if building would cause an ~~overpopulation~~ you're forced to pass.

| II || R/G || Y/B || This game works better, but the R/G combo is frustrating: if building would cause an Overpopulation you're forced to pass.

|-

| III || R/B || Y/G || This game is most balanced. We had great fun. It has reversal of fortune (you can win, even when you seem lost).

| III || R/B || Y/G || This game is most balanced. The Y/G prevents passes / Overpopulations: if you'd create a Catastrophe with Green, you can use Yellow to spread out. We had great fun. It has reversal of fortune (you can win, even when you seem lost).

|}

Table. "Two-Two" Combos.

'''Table.''' "Two-Two" Combos.

* On my way home I considered that, indeed, one could even assign 2 allowed actions to any throw of a D6 as follows:

Line 64:

| 6 || Y/G

|}

'''Table.''' "Half-Half". All C(4,2) = 6 color combo's appear with equal probability.

Table. "Half half".

I playtested this game, and it was delightful. Complete with what we have started to call "reversal of fortune" (see above). This game has the most intriguing scenarios of all the above variants; it is perfectly balanced. For each turn, a particular action has a probability of 1/2, but it's paired with one of the others at random. It works particularly well. Please, give it a try.